Skip to main content

Hiring a marketing specialist vs a generalist

Comparison

A generalist covers many channels at moderate depth and suits early-stage companies still discovering what works. A specialist goes deep on one channel and suits companies that already know which channel produces revenue. Hiring the wrong one wastes roughly a year.

When the first option wins

A generalist wins before you know which channel works. Testing six channels shallowly is the correct move when the answer is genuinely unknown, and a specialist would optimise a channel that may not matter.

When the second option wins

A specialist wins once one channel is clearly producing pipeline. At that point depth compounds and breadth dilutes.

Verdict

The common error is hiring a generalist after you already know the answer, then wondering why nothing gets meaningfully better. Ask which stage you are actually in before writing the job description.

Not sure which applies to you? Describe the situation.

Start the conversation

See where you currently appear in AI answers.

Start the conversation